You cannot tell if AI names you
Buyers ask assistants which brands to consider, and the answer does not show in your analytics, so your presence stays a guess.
GEO shows whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google's AI Overviews name your brand, who they name instead and what to fix. Regular re-sweeps show which way you move.
















Buyers ask assistants which brands to consider, and the answer does not show in your analytics, so your presence stays a guess.
The brands an assistant names are not always the competitors on your list, so you may be watching the wrong field.
Generic advice to publish more content does not say which pages, sources or fixes matter for your brand, so effort spreads thin.
Every answer shows whether you are cited, in what position and who appears instead, so you know where you stand. A panel of 25 starter questions covers four engines.
Content and outreach go where the gaps are, not to every directory. A source map of up to 12 cited domains marks where you are absent, and briefs cover missing page types.
Log a change and see which direction your presence moved. One 0 to 100 score on fixed weights, stamped with its method version, keeps the trend fair.
Ready to see who AI names for your brand?
See VIMDRIVE in actionYour brand, market and sector produce a panel of 25 starter questions in English, yours to tailor to how your buyers ask.
One sweep across each engine sets your baseline. Open any answer to see whether you are named, in what position and who is named instead.
Your fix list incorporates 16 read-only site checks, a source map and briefs for missing page types. Regular re-sweeps then show which way your presence moves.
| Topic | Traditional agency model | With VIMDRIVE |
|---|---|---|
| AI visibility | Usually judged from spot checks in a single assistant | A panel of 25 questions asked across four engines, every answer kept to read |
| Rivals | Rival lists usually come from the brief, not from the answers | A leaderboard drawn from the answers, including rivals you never listed |
| What to fix | Recommendations tend to be general advice on content and links | Site checks, a source map and page briefs point at real gaps |
| Trend | Progress is usually described in a periodic report | Regular re-sweeps and one fixed-weight score show which way you move |
| Site checks | Crawler and structured data checks usually sit inside a wider audit | Read-only checks cover structured data to crawler access, and never edit your site |
Run one sweep and the matrix shows it. Your questions go to ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google's AI Overviews, and each cell shows whether you are cited, your position and who else is named. You can open any answer in full.
No. GEO reads your site and never edits it. Its 16 checks cover your homepage, robots.txt, sitemap and llms.txt, and anything that warns or fails goes on your fix list, with a brief for missing page types.
Enough to decide where to act, read as a direction. You benefit from fixed weights and a method version stamped on each snapshot. Each question is asked once per engine per sweep, so small moves can be noise, and answers can differ from the consumer apps.
Not directly. GEO shows whether AI names you when buyers compare options, and where to strengthen that. It measures presence, not leads or revenue, and sets no bid or campaign. The site tag counts visits from AI assistants, as a minimum where assistants hide their source.
See how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google's AI Overviews answer for your brand, and decide what to fix first.